<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Return to Biblicism &#187; KJVO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblicism.wordpress.com/category/kjvo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Christocentric Approach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='biblicism.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://biblicism.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Return to Biblicism" />
		<item>
		<title>Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar: Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stopped taking notes at around slide #150. I did note some of the Q&#38;A time, but I addressed much of that in previous posts. Plus, I see this series has run its course. So I want wrap to this up with a few concluding thoughts.
The good
1. Dr. Waite&#8217;s gentlemanly demeanor. It&#8217;s unfortunate that Dr. Waite [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=771&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #109-153: Translation Technique</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/an-analysis-of-dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-109-153-translation-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/an-analysis-of-dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-109-153-translation-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part VII &#8211; Translation Technique (Slides #109-153)
The final section that I have noted deals with the supposedly superior translation techniques employed by the King James translators. One must note that this particular issue is an entirely different one (together with the superiority of the translators) in the stream of elemental KJVO argumentation. This deals with [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=773&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/an-analysis-of-dr-d-a-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-109-153-translation-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/vintagepen.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vintagepen</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #84-108: The KJV Translators</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-84-108-the-kjv-translators/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-84-108-the-kjv-translators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part VI &#8211; The Translators (Slides #84-108)
If I were to mention to a KJV user that modern biblical scholarship continues to advance so that today we have more precise texts and translations of the Bible, I would be charged with “scholarolatry” &#8211; the heresy of trusting in man’s wisdom to teach me God’s truth. One [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=765&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-84-108-the-kjv-translators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/john-reynolds.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">john-reynolds</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #66-83: &#8220;Things that are different are. . .?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-66-83-things-that-are-different-are/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-66-83-things-that-are-different-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Part V: The Differences Between the Texts (Slides #67-83)
Slide #67, titled “the Battleground”,  introduces the next part in the seminar: the differences between the texts. Waite repeats the statistic of difference also used by the Trinitarian Bible society, a 7% difference. This stands in contrast to the more common statistic of a 2% difference given [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=757&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-66-83-things-that-are-different-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/2-bibles.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-bibles</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/things-different1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">things-different1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #48-66: More Guilt by Association and Double Standards, too</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-48-66-more-guilt-by-association-and-double-standards-too/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-48-66-more-guilt-by-association-and-double-standards-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section IV (con&#8217;t.) &#8211; Slides #48-66
Waite points out Westcott and Hort’s reliance on Codex Vaticanus (B) in guiding their textual choices. Therefore, he tries to slander this manuscript as untrustworthy, heretical, and corrupt. It is true that the two clergymen did hold B in very high esteem, but as I noted before, most modern textual [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=752&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-48-66-more-guilt-by-association-and-double-standards-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/scrap-paper.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scrap-paper</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. James D. Price on Providential Preservation</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/dr-james-d-price-on-providential-preservation/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/dr-james-d-price-on-providential-preservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books and Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a privilege to be able to post, with his permission, an essay on the topic of the preservation of scripture by Dr. James D. Price. I&#8217;ve been helped by some of his articles on the Internet and most recently by his book, King James Onlyism: A New Sect. The 600+ page book serves [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=738&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/dr-james-d-price-on-providential-preservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/dr-price.jpg?w=178" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dr-price</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #37-47: Guilt by Association</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-37-47-guilt-by-association/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-37-47-guilt-by-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Section IV &#8211; Guilt by Association (Slides #31-47)
Slides #31 and 32 display the good tree of Bibles and the bad tree, respectively. Again, the problem is that the “good” tree contains Bibles which disagree with each other. 
Slide #34 lists four questions that supposedly makes one raise an eyebrow about consulting a modern version. Unfortunately, it [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=732&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-37-47-guilt-by-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/westcotthort.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">westcotthort</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #17-30: The Textual Argument</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-17-30-the-textual-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-17-30-the-textual-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Section III  - The Textual Argument (Slides #17-30)
Waite claims that the KJV is God’s only Word because it is translated from superior texts. But the terminology alone seems to defeat this argument: for the Hebrew text, Waite claims that the “true” text is the “Traditional Masoretic Text, Daniel Bomberg Edition, 2nd Great Rabbinic Bible, Edited by [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=727&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-17-30-the-textual-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/sinaiticus1.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sinaiticus1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #5-16: &#8220;God&#8217;s Words Kept Intact&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-5-16-gods-words-kept-intact/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-5-16-gods-words-kept-intact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section II &#8211; “God’s Words Kept Intact”: The Preservation Argument (Slides #5-#16)
  Just observing this title, the word “intact” is again an indication of the underlying false  premise: the written Word has to be “intact” (entire, exact) in order to be God’s Word. Anything that amounts to anything less than a 100% equivalent [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=722&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-5-16-gods-words-kept-intact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/images.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">images</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Analysis of Dr. D.A. Waite&#8217;s King James Only Seminar, Slides #1-4: The Root of the King James Only Position</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-1-4-the-root-of-the-king-james-only-position/</link>
		<comments>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-1-4-the-root-of-the-king-james-only-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien T Garofalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KJVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblicism.wordpress.com/?p=717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My personal view on the King James Only position is that it is rooted in a misconception about the place of biblical inerrancy in Christian doctrine. Its basic premise is: Christianity stands or falls on biblical inerrancy. 
 To begin his seminar, Dr. Waite began with this very premise. The first slide in his presentation represents [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=biblicism.wordpress.com&blog=2051227&post=717&subd=biblicism&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/an-analysis-of-dr-da-waites-king-james-only-seminar-slides-1-4-the-root-of-the-king-james-only-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/adbbd9f33889a749d1095585341da24c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Damien</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://biblicism.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/dbsemblem.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dbsemblem</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>