<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblicism.wordpress.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Christocentric Approach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ModernBibleReader</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/about/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>ModernBibleReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Unbelieveable! I love this blog - I stumbled over it, and LOVE the analysis of DA Waite&#039;s process of how he distorts quotations and his logical fallacies. I&#039;ve long suspected his &quot;evidence&quot; was bogus, but didn&#039;t have the resources to find these quotes. I am very glad to see someone who does actually print the whole, unedited, undistorted quotes. This proves he is intentionally and willfully creating a distorted view to support his position, not letting the facts speak for themselves. People don&#039;t have the resources to track down these obscure quotes.

Would you put a third-party fringe candidate in charge of your country? Would you put a homeopathic remedy salesman in charge of your hospital? Would you put a changeling in charge of your daycare? Would you put DA Waite in charge of Bible preservation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelieveable! I love this blog &#8211; I stumbled over it, and LOVE the analysis of DA Waite&#8217;s process of how he distorts quotations and his logical fallacies. I&#8217;ve long suspected his &#8220;evidence&#8221; was bogus, but didn&#8217;t have the resources to find these quotes. I am very glad to see someone who does actually print the whole, unedited, undistorted quotes. This proves he is intentionally and willfully creating a distorted view to support his position, not letting the facts speak for themselves. People don&#8217;t have the resources to track down these obscure quotes.</p>
<p>Would you put a third-party fringe candidate in charge of your country? Would you put a homeopathic remedy salesman in charge of your hospital? Would you put a changeling in charge of your daycare? Would you put DA Waite in charge of Bible preservation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/about/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken the liberty of posting about your blog, and hope that it will send some traffic your way!  The post will be up tomorrow in the early morning.

I, too, feel that fundamentalism has lost its historic roots, and wandered from the intentions of the men that founded the movement.  Unfortunately, evangelicalism, as well, is now a movement with no boundaries whatsoever, so it seems we must carve out a new movement of our own!

Thank you for your well-written posts, and I&#039;m glad to have found you, and added you to my blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken the liberty of posting about your blog, and hope that it will send some traffic your way!  The post will be up tomorrow in the early morning.</p>
<p>I, too, feel that fundamentalism has lost its historic roots, and wandered from the intentions of the men that founded the movement.  Unfortunately, evangelicalism, as well, is now a movement with no boundaries whatsoever, so it seems we must carve out a new movement of our own!</p>
<p>Thank you for your well-written posts, and I&#8217;m glad to have found you, and added you to my blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Medina</title>
		<link>http://biblicism.wordpress.com/about/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hi fundamental Biblicists,

I found your blog while reading some comments about teetotalism from fundamental Baptist pastor Kent Brandenburg&#039;s blog. A quick look at your blogroll and recommended links reveals where you are coming from theologically. We are on the same ground. 

I was raised &quot;neo-evangelical,&quot; and  was attracted for some time to Baptist fundamentalism. By God&#039;s grace, I ended up where you are now. I hope to see your thoughts on that controversial issue called &quot;second-degree separation.&quot; Reformed Christians hardly talk about that anymore. Thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi fundamental Biblicists,</p>
<p>I found your blog while reading some comments about teetotalism from fundamental Baptist pastor Kent Brandenburg&#8217;s blog. A quick look at your blogroll and recommended links reveals where you are coming from theologically. We are on the same ground. </p>
<p>I was raised &#8220;neo-evangelical,&#8221; and  was attracted for some time to Baptist fundamentalism. By God&#8217;s grace, I ended up where you are now. I hope to see your thoughts on that controversial issue called &#8220;second-degree separation.&#8221; Reformed Christians hardly talk about that anymore. Thanks. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
